Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 04:17

Russia can stop this any time.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Telescope Captures First-Ever Ultra-Fine Magnetic Stripes on the Sun’s Surface! - The Daily Galaxy
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
What’s next?
Just in the last 5 years:
Are MAGA the "useful idiots" for the radical-right billionaires like Charles Koch and Elon Musk?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
‘A welcome silence’ emerges from insurance companies on COVID vaccine coverage - AJC.com
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Alex Cora reacts to Boston Red Sox trading Rafael Devers, what went wrong - MassLive
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Tyrese Haliburton reveals he has ‘24/7’ group chat with Cailtin Clark - New York Post
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.